By: Amadou BahÂ
In an outrageous move that has exploded public outcry and sparked heated debates across the nation, President Adama Barrow has exercised his powers under Section 82 of the 1997 Constitution to pardon 37 prisoners, including individuals convicted of rape, murder, and other serious crimes.
The decision has raised eyebrows and drawn fierce criticism from various quarters, with the Honourable Modou Lamin Bah, the National Assembly member for Banjul North, leading the charge in expressing concern.
The controversial pardons have prompted the honourable PM of Banjul North to question the very essence of the society in which citizens live. The inclusion of rapists, murderers, and notorious criminals in the presidential pardon has left many wondering about the values and principles the nation upholds.
Modou Lamin Bah, as a representative of the people, has raised several critical questions regarding the process surrounding the pardons, casting doubt on the adherence to established regulations and procedures. Among the questions posed are concerns about the approval of the three-member committees by the National Assembly, the selection criteria for the pardoned individuals, and whether due process was followed.
The national assembly member also raised a series of interesting questions, challenging the government’s commitment to protecting the vulnerable in society. Questions like, “What message are we sending as a nation that claims to protect our children?” and “Where is our commitment to the never-again mantra?” are resonating with a public eager for answers.
Bah further questioned the government’s dedication to women’s empowerment, pointing out the apparent contradiction in granting amnesty to convicted rapists while claiming commitment to the cause. He emphasised the need for consistency in policies that align with the nation’s values and aspirations.
The controversy deepened, with Bah questioning the release of murderers, individuals convicted of drug abuse, and those charged with minor offenses.
He argued that such actions raised serious doubts about the government’s commitment to public safety and the fight against corruption.
Perhaps the most cutting critique came in response to the president’s pardon of a public official convicted of corruption. Bah, highlighting a recent journalist’s investigation that led to a court conviction, expressed disbelief at the decision to pardon the only individual held accountable for public malfeasance. This raised the pertinent question of the government’s sincerity in its proclaimed commitment to combating corruption.
In a passionate plea, Bah urged the national assembly to take decisive action to ensure accountability and transparency in the exercise of the president’s powers of prerogative of mercy. “This is our responsibility, and we cannot mortgage that responsibility to anyone; due process must be followed, and the president’s office must be advised to follow its policies,” lamented the national assembly member for Banjul North.
As the controversy continues to unfold, the nation awaits answers, demanding transparency, accountability, and a thorough examination of the processes leading to these controversial pardons. The president’s decision has not only opened old wounds but has also ignited a national conversation about the values and principles that should guide the nation’s actions.